SPEECH
We
Must Fight Terrorism on Our Own : Sonia Gandhi
The
text of Mrs. Sonia Gandhi’s speech at a seminar on “International
Cooperation Against Terrorism - Implications and Choices
for India” organised by the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation in New
Delhi on 9 October, 2001
As
we meet here today, dark and menacing clouds of conflict,
even war are visible in our region. Terrorism is no longer
just a sinister word, but a murderous reality. Terrorists
respect no frontiers or boundaries. They respect no law,
tolerance, humanity or harmony.
India
is not a frontline state in the emerging international coalition
against terrorism, but it is certainly in the frontline
of countries afflicted by terrorism. For almost half a century,
the Indian state has confronted terrorism in its varying
forms - secessionist, ideological or criminal - in different
parts of the country.
India
has experienced its destabilizing effects and human and
economic costs. In states like Mizoram and Punjab; we have
found solutions but elsewhere, where cross-border terrorism
is concerned, we have a long way to go. The agony of Jammu
and Kashmir drags on. I express our profound sense of sympathy
and grief at last week’s attack in Srinagar, to the people
of Jammu and Kashmir and the bereaved families.
Terrorism
like for thousands of others has a deep personal resonance
for me. It has twice darkened my life and that of my children.
The September 11 attacks on New York and Washington touched
a nerve in all of us, piling horror upon horror. Our hearts
went out to the victims and their families and to the American
people as a whole. We are witnessing an ominous and dramatic
escalation of international terrorism. And thanks to the
global media, the world is made aware of its power and effects.
Added
to the mournful catalogue of plane hijacking and bombings
- such as those of Air India 1985 and PanAm in 1988, each
with hundreds killed - we now have aircraft used as flying
bombs to wreck massive destruction, and send shock waves
through the global economy.
900
million viewers watched the terrorist attack at the Munich
Olympic Games in 1972; more than 4 billion saw the World
Trade Centre crumble. The technology of terrorism in weapons
and explosives is also constantly being upgraded. Sarin
nerve gas was used in the Tokyo subway in 1995. No category
of civilian is any longer immune, whether tourists in Egypt
or pilgrims on their way to Amarnath in Kashmir.
The
‘Great Terror’ of the French Revolution which first gave
rise to the term ‘terrorist’ pales in comparison to what
we see today. Terrorism poses a major threat to India’s
national security, the integrity of the country, the viability
of our democracy and the future of our pluralist society.
Terrorism feeds on division and grievances within society,
but it also deepens them.
We
may be at one of history’s crossroads, one of those moments
on which the future hinges. Already there is talk that some
good may come of the destruction that we witnessed on September
11. The US may have to look again at those of its policies,
notably in West Asia, which have caused so much resentment
and suffering and fuelled such deadly hatred.
Last
month’s events have focussed attention on terrorism like
nothing before, and world opinion is unifying in its opposition
to this menace. It is my hope that as the world unites on
this issue, we will all be able to work for a common goal
to fight terrorism in all its forms, wherever exists.
Jammu
and Kashmir, inevitably, is at the centre of our thinking
at this juncture. Last week’s suicide bombing of the State
Assembly has given new urgency to our concerns. While the
statements in Washington, London and Paris in response to
the tragedy in Srinagar may mark a new development and herald
greater understanding of India’s position, we must recognise
that the primary responsibility for combating terrorism
remains with us.
Clearly
there are no simple solutions. So even as the armed forces
remain vigilant, India must be creative in exploring every
possible avenue of reconciliation in Jammu and Kashmir.
Even as we make efforts to reach the hearts of our own young
people, we have to ensure that our neighbour does not continue
to play its deadly game. We expect the leaders of the West
not to lose sight of this reality, in developing the global
coalition against terrorism.
The
United Nations must play a leading role so that the wishes
of all its member countries are taken into account. The
Non-Aligned too must rise to the occasion and provide relevant
inputs to the new international agenda in which terrorism
is inflicting havoc on us all.
Sincerity
to the cause of fighting terrorism also demands a much higher
level of political effort with countries of the Islamic
world, who also shared the world’s horror at the events
of September 11. We need their solidarity and support. We
must constantly remind ourselves that our fight is with
terrorism and not with Islam. This must be the bedrock of
our policy, without ambiguity or equivocation. The fight
against terrorism imposes on us four obligations to be clear
sighted, determined, persistent and vigilant.
Many
of you have years of experience in Government and other
specialized spheres and will know better than others how
the system works - or rather, how it fails to work counter-terrorism
requires sophisticated intelligence backed by co-ordinated
political, security, administrative and economic responses,
psychological insight and skillful media communication.
I am afraid our system does not fully measure up. Different
departments, agencies and ministries become competent power
centres, in institutional and professional rivalries, and
do not work with coordination on a common cause of purpose.
We are not given to quick and effective decision making
and we need to be far more alert and responsive than we
have been in the past. Finally, in our federal system, the
Centre and States should cooperate closely when it comes
to fighting terrorism.
The
question must be asked whether our institutional structures
and, in particular, the National Security Council as presently
conceived, can deal adequately with the menace of terrorism.
Is the Council capable of bringing focused and undivided
attention on the issue, based on a recognition that terrorism
is more than just a law and order problem?
Today’s
terrorists are sophisticated, highly trained and strongly
motivated. They are constantly developing ingenious and
innovative methods. They command vast financial resources.
They have linkages inside and outside the country. They
are ready to die for their cause. They thus constitute a
formidable adversary. Nimble-footed, specialized and highly
professional approaches are required to deal with them.
With the threat of increased terrorism, perhaps, we need
to look carefully at our structures and anti-terrorist forces
and institutions to see how they can be more effective.
Better anticipation and prevention are vital for successfully
combating terrorism. I am confident that during the course
of your deliberations you will reflect on the upsurge of
terrorist activities and its many different courses in different
parts of the world. All these are issues that will affect
the future of our nation and generations to come. I would
like to add that the forum in which we are meeting encourages
discussion and debate and the presentation of diverse and
possible conflicting opinion. This we do in order to gain
a greater understanding of issues and find solutions to
problems.