View-point
UPA
Offers Hope, Not Hype
The CMP is
a sober, responsive document that reflects the 2004 mandate.
The CMP enjoys the support of all parties. It is a Left-of-Centre
oriented document.
We had six
years of the NDA government which threw fiscal rectitude
out of the window. The CMP is a do-able document over a
medium-term period. It is a five-year document, not a one-day
match. It marries social concerns with economic reality.
This is, in many ways, no different from the 1996 document
and it has around 85 percent of the Congress manifesto.
So there are no sharp breaks from the past Ð except in privatization,
which is no surprise because the Congress and the Left are
part of the alliance together. Even there, we are for privatization,
but we are against the jehadi type of privatization pursued
by the previous government.
In fact,
the BJP government had reduced reforms to privatization;
Arun Shourie had become its poster boy and markets built
up expectation and therefore a market bubble was formed.
In the CMP, we have sensible privatization, which is very
much along the lines of what was prescribed by GV Ramakrishna,
for example.
Corporate
India was BJP-friendly. Fund managers were BJP-friendly.
They've not voted us into power. They would have been happy
with a BJP government. But what we're having right now are
merely teething problems. The first concrete step is the
Budget, and we'll address the problems in the Budget.
Economic
policy-making can't take place in back-rooms; it is the
result of mass politics, not elite concerns. One of the
great mistakes, and which I'm also party to Ð I myself admit
it Ð is that we've given a technocratic colour to our reforms,
that we've approached these issues purely from a technocratic
perspective. And that anyone who expressed concerns on this
kind of reforms was dubbed as obscurantist. We have to recognize
that we are part of a political system.
One can't
reduce all of India to IT. We applaud all that has been
done in pharma, at the way we've unleashed the creative
energies of our entrepreneurs, at how Indian industry has
become leaner and meaner. But we're not an Argentina, a
Russia or even a China. We have our own political system
and we have to go by that.
We recognize
that middle classes are a very important segment. Surprisingly,
they also voted for us Ð in Delhi, in Mumbai. I think you'll
find this importance reflected in the Budget. It is also
there in the CMP, but has been missed out in all this noise;
we've said interest rates will provide incentives, both
to investors and to savers and that there must be a balance
between savers and borrowers. In the last two years, there
has been a shift in balance and this has hurt the interest
of savers.
The 2004
verdict reflects the fact that middle class was hurt by
wrong policies and our PR campaign highlighted that. And
it resonated very well. In my view, the BJP's greatest mistake
was to create unnecessary hype. The UPA offers hope, BJP
offers hype.
(Based on
an interview in The Times of India)
A
Memorable Battle of Ballot
Commitment,
determination and hard work have set the nation in the right
direction. The undeniable charisma of the Congress President,
Smt. Sonia Gandhi, provided the much-needed spark for the
eagerly-awaited change. In our state of J&K the Congress
and its allies have won four out of six Lok Sabha seats.
Doubts were raised over the prospects of the Congress in
the state, but the voters smashed these doubts.
As the election
process started, the people and even party workers were
confused by the aggressive `feel good' campaign of the BJP-NDA.
Their campaign looked like a storm. Indeed it was and lasted
only for a while. It did not take the people too long to
see through the BJP-NDA game. Undeterred by the saffron
onslaught our party workers went about their task of explaining
to the people the issues at stake in J&K particular
and the country in general. This systematic and committed
approach more than neutralized the caste-based campaign
resorted to by the BJP after it realised that the `feel
good' and `Shining India' gambits had failed.
Smt. Sonia
Gandhi's visit made a tremendous impact on the voter. The
gains were effectively consolidated by the far-sighted approach
of the PCC president, Shri Ghulam Nabi Azad who personally
supervised the election campaign leading it to success.
It was a memorable battle of ballot.