|
|
States
Watch
Madhya
Pradesh
Daljit
Singh Stresses BCs Welfare
 |
| AICC
secretary, Shri Daljit Singh attending a meeting of
the district presidents of Backward class Department
in Bhopal on May 31. PCC Backward Class department chief
Rambhoovan Singh Patel addresssed the meet. Others present
are Ramashwar Nikhra, Mahavir Prasad, Deepchand Yadav,
Rajkumar Patel and Masorat Shahid. |
BHOPAL
:
AICC secretary and incharge of Madhya Pradesh, Shri Daljit
Singh, while addressing the district presidents of the Pradesh
Congress Committee Backward Class Department here on 31
May advised that a separate cell should be set up with backward
class representatives from the ministries, Pradesh Congress
Committee and the District Congress Committees to help solve
the problems of these classes.
Pradesh
vice-president, Shri Rameshwar Nikhra said the BJP is looking
for an opportunity to malign the image of chief minister,
Shri Digvijay Singh. BJP has not done anything for development.
Shri Rajkumar Patel, PCC general secretary, said that there
should be a provision of 14% reservation for backward classes
in government service. It should be our duty to bring together
the people of 87 communities from backward classes into
the mainstream and it should be our strong determination
to bring these people from backward classes into the party
fold.
The
meeting was presided over by Pradesh Congress Committee
Backward Class president, Shri Rambhoovan Singh Patel and
others present were PCC vice-president Shri Mahavir Prasad
Vashist, general secretary, Shri Govind Goyal, general secretary,
Smt. Masarat Shahid, Backward Class Pradesh secretary, Shri
Ramsharan Singh Rana, Shri Gulabchand Shahu and other office-bearers.
NHRC
Initiative on Best Bakery Case Hailed
Shri
Abhishek Singhvi, AICC spokesperson, issued the following
statement on July 2, 2003.
"We
welcome the National Human Rights Commission’s initiation
of inquiries regarding the conduct of the Best Bakery Case
by the State Government. The shocking behaviour of State
agencies in conducting a collusive prosecution foredoomed
to failure is consistent with their past conduct over the
Gujarat killings.
A
predetermined Chief Minister has successfully presided over
a collusive prosecution agency, permitted suborning of witnesses
and disappearance of complaints in a trial where truth has
been the major casualty. The verdict has been followed by
eloquent silence regarding appeals.
Even
if appeals are filed, we can accurately guess their fate
in the hands of such a predisposed state agency. Nothing
short of reopening the case entirely, placing it in the
hands of a specially appointed independent public prosecutor
and punishing those responsible for the collusive prosecution
can even begin to satisfy the ends of justice."
|
|